1. Recognize the related legislatures and regulations to support the needs from your institution.
My school is a public school in the state of Texas therefore it falls under all regulations and legislations set forth by the Texas State Board of Education and Texas Education Agency, as well as No Child Left Behind federal regulations. Within TEA there are guidelines for the use of technology in education. These can be found in the Long-Range Plan for Technology 2006-2020.
All learners:
• have access to relevant technologies, tools, resources and services for
individualized instruction 24/7.
• use information and communication technologies to collaborate, construct
knowledge and provide solutions to real-world problems.
• use research based strategies in all subject areas to improve academic
achievement.
• communicate effectively in a variety of formats for diverse audiences.
All educators:
• graduate from an educator preparation program that models current
technology in instructional and administrative practices PreK-12.
• exit educator preparation programs knowing how to use technology
effectively in the teaching and learning process.
• develop new learning environments that utilize technology as a flexible tool
where learning is collaborative, interactive and customized.
• ensure integration of appropriate technology throughout all of curriculum
and instruction.
All leaders:
• develop, implement, budget for and monitor a dynamic technology plan to
meet the needs of a changing workforce and economy.
• create innovative, flexible and responsive environments to maximize
teaching and learning and community involvement.
• Offer expanded curricular and instructional opportunities to students via
online, digital technology, and a variety of distance learning technologies
• provide opportunities for sustained, relevant and timely staff development in
a variety of formats.
• expect and plan appropriate technology use throughout the teaching and
learning process as well as throughout administration.
• Use data effectively and appropriately in decision making.
An infrastructure system provides:
• access to all e-learning technologies through ubiquitous broadband
resources available 24/7 for all users.
• just-in-time technical assistance to support teaching and learning.
• measures to ensure all data is secure and accurate.
- data standards to support interoperability and accessibility for all users.
I((Long-range Technology Plan, 2012)
D
The parts of the plan that I see my own school and district falling short in are: 1) All educators develop new learning environments that utilize technology as a flexible tool where learning is collaborative, interactive and customized; 2) all leaders develop, implement, budget for and monitor a dynamic technology plan to meet the needs of a changing workforce and economy; and 3) all leaders expect and plan appropriate technology use throughout the teaching and learning process as well as throughout administration.
2. Develop the objectives for the school technology plan based on the needs from your institution.
Our new Technology Plan provides recommendations to the district in four key areas in alignment with the state Long-Range Plan for Technology, 1996 - 2013. These are:
· Teaching and Learning
· Staff Development
· Administration and Support Services
· Infrastructure for Technology
The recommendations made in this plan will prepare students and educators for the world of learning and work in the 21st century. The Beaumont Independent School District is committed to providing our graduates with necessary skills, values, and knowledge to compete successfully as productive citizens in an information-driven global society.
To meet this expectation, the district must equip its classrooms with appropriate technology and ensure universal accessibility to that technology. The district must also provide staff development to ensure highly skilled teachers who can integrate technology into the curriculum to increase student learning. New technologies are needed to raise the levels of instruction, learning and school management required to meet our state and national education goals in alignment with No Child Left Behind, as well as the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology. The Beaumont Independent School District must create innovative uses for the wide area network as well as the District Intranet and Internet.
Successful technology implementation is dependent on effecting a behavioral change on the part of teachers, staff and administrators. This change takes a great deal of time, support, training and enthusiasm from all participants. These changes must be locked in place with long term planning, consistent focus on implementation and administrative and community support. Each phase of implementation must be monitored for effectiveness and the plan altered when the need arises.
· Teaching and Learning
· Staff Development
· Administration and Support Services
· Infrastructure for Technology
The recommendations made in this plan will prepare students and educators for the world of learning and work in the 21st century. The Beaumont Independent School District is committed to providing our graduates with necessary skills, values, and knowledge to compete successfully as productive citizens in an information-driven global society.
To meet this expectation, the district must equip its classrooms with appropriate technology and ensure universal accessibility to that technology. The district must also provide staff development to ensure highly skilled teachers who can integrate technology into the curriculum to increase student learning. New technologies are needed to raise the levels of instruction, learning and school management required to meet our state and national education goals in alignment with No Child Left Behind, as well as the Texas Long-Range Plan for Technology. The Beaumont Independent School District must create innovative uses for the wide area network as well as the District Intranet and Internet.
Successful technology implementation is dependent on effecting a behavioral change on the part of teachers, staff and administrators. This change takes a great deal of time, support, training and enthusiasm from all participants. These changes must be locked in place with long term planning, consistent focus on implementation and administrative and community support. Each phase of implementation must be monitored for effectiveness and the plan altered when the need arises.
Critical factors for achieving NCLB, E-Rate, and Long-Range Plan for Technology requirements remain to be:
*Time to accommodate technology-related professional development
Due to increased demands on the time of all personnel, the scheduling of staff development opportunities continues to be a challenge. Various methods of training have been incorporated into staff development, however reaching all necessary staff with effective training is not always accomplished. The district has begun to evaluate on-line, on-demand, and real-time video-based training on a small scale to see if technology can assist with effectively reaching all users. The initial response has been very positive. Utilizing this technology is proving to be a great success since ALL users can be reached with the necessary information at a time when the individual is available to participate. This new type of professional development delivery will greatly reduce the amount of necessary trainers while effectively conveying topic specific staff development to ALL users. This new solution however, brings about new challenges. Not only will the district have to invest in hardware and software to deliver the content but will also be required to have necessary technical personnel to ensure that the infrastructure is available at all times.
*Need for technical personnel to support all existing and new technologies
Technology continues to change on a daily basis and the demands for utilizing new technologies in the classroom are sky rocketing. Many technologies which have traditionally been maintained by other departments are now being incorporated into the IT world. These technologies include security systems, voice communications, video, and building controls just to name a few. These new technologies can greatly enhance learning, provide for safer schools, and reduce overall costs but not without an impact on IT environments. The necessary skilled personnel will have to be put in place to support the new demands in all areas of computing
*Increased need for instructional technology personnel in the classrooms
Teachers are focused on delivering the best possible lessons in classrooms and have been well-trained in traditional teaching methods. In today’s technology world, teachers must be able to embrace and incorporate new teaching methods into their curriculum utilizing these innovative technologies. By implementing new positions in instructional technology, classroom teachers could begin to observe and develop new lessons geared towards technology-minded students.
*Demands for technology funding
Funding continues to be a challenge for all school systems and with current economic trends there is no change on the horizon. Districts must try to find creative solutions for funding projects while at the same time working smarter to reduce costs in all areas. The district will continue to focus on funding sources such as grants and E-Rate while at the same time evaluating technologies which can potentially save dollars through reduced energy consumption and consolidation of services. (BISD Technology Plan, 2012)
*Time to accommodate technology-related professional development
Due to increased demands on the time of all personnel, the scheduling of staff development opportunities continues to be a challenge. Various methods of training have been incorporated into staff development, however reaching all necessary staff with effective training is not always accomplished. The district has begun to evaluate on-line, on-demand, and real-time video-based training on a small scale to see if technology can assist with effectively reaching all users. The initial response has been very positive. Utilizing this technology is proving to be a great success since ALL users can be reached with the necessary information at a time when the individual is available to participate. This new type of professional development delivery will greatly reduce the amount of necessary trainers while effectively conveying topic specific staff development to ALL users. This new solution however, brings about new challenges. Not only will the district have to invest in hardware and software to deliver the content but will also be required to have necessary technical personnel to ensure that the infrastructure is available at all times.
*Need for technical personnel to support all existing and new technologies
Technology continues to change on a daily basis and the demands for utilizing new technologies in the classroom are sky rocketing. Many technologies which have traditionally been maintained by other departments are now being incorporated into the IT world. These technologies include security systems, voice communications, video, and building controls just to name a few. These new technologies can greatly enhance learning, provide for safer schools, and reduce overall costs but not without an impact on IT environments. The necessary skilled personnel will have to be put in place to support the new demands in all areas of computing
*Increased need for instructional technology personnel in the classrooms
Teachers are focused on delivering the best possible lessons in classrooms and have been well-trained in traditional teaching methods. In today’s technology world, teachers must be able to embrace and incorporate new teaching methods into their curriculum utilizing these innovative technologies. By implementing new positions in instructional technology, classroom teachers could begin to observe and develop new lessons geared towards technology-minded students.
*Demands for technology funding
Funding continues to be a challenge for all school systems and with current economic trends there is no change on the horizon. Districts must try to find creative solutions for funding projects while at the same time working smarter to reduce costs in all areas. The district will continue to focus on funding sources such as grants and E-Rate while at the same time evaluating technologies which can potentially save dollars through reduced energy consumption and consolidation of services. (BISD Technology Plan, 2012)
3. Identify the objective for each area of Technology, Funding, and Management. Provide the needed elements for each objective to make sure that it’s measurable.
These goals, objectives and strategies are a part of our Beaumont Independent School District Technology Plan. However, I personally feel that though they are in print they are not being met. Therefore I still classify the specifics of each one as a “need”.
GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND STRATEGIES
Goal 1: Incorporate technology as an integral part of education.
Objective 1.1: In 3 years student graduating from BISD will demonstrate knowledge needed to direct their continued pursuit of knowledge in digital world of information.
Budget for this objective: $503,214.00
LRPT Category: Teaching and Learning
E-Rate Correlates:
NCLB Correlates: 01 02 03 04a 07
Objective 1.1: In 3 years student graduating from BISD will demonstrate knowledge needed to direct their continued pursuit of knowledge in digital world of information.
Budget for this objective: $503,214.00
LRPT Category: Teaching and Learning
E-Rate Correlates:
NCLB Correlates: 01 02 03 04a 07
Strategy 1.1.2: Students will use technology in inquiry standards-based lessons that require collaboration and higher-level thinking skills.
State: Original
Status: In Progress
Timeline: Ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Curriculum Supervisors Principals Technology Lead Teachers All Classroom Teachers
Evidence: Collaborative student technology projects, teacher lesson plans, walk-though observations 85% of teachers will include at least one higher-level thinking technology activity bi-monthly
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP04, EP05, TL04, TL06, TL07, TL08
State: Original
Status: In Progress
Timeline: Ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Curriculum Supervisors Principals Technology Lead Teachers All Classroom Teachers
Evidence: Collaborative student technology projects, teacher lesson plans, walk-though observations 85% of teachers will include at least one higher-level thinking technology activity bi-monthly
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP04, EP05, TL04, TL06, TL07, TL08
Goal 2: Provide staff development for all in the use of appropriate emerging technologies and their integration as a natural part of education.
Objective 2.1: Plan staff development activities to meet expectations for technology proficiencies for educators.
Budget for this objective: $532,106.00
LRPT Category: Educator Preparation and Development
E-Rate Correlates: ER02
NCLB Correlates: 01 02 03 04a 04b
Strategy 2.1.5: Provide ongoing sustained professional development for teachers, principals, administrators, and school library media personnel to further the effective use of technology in the classroom or library media center.
State: Original
Status: In Progress
Timeline: Immediate and ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Director of Information Services Director of Performance Management/Instructional Technology Director of Staff Development Designated administrators
Evidence: Staff development evaluation and number of attendees
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP05, EP09, TL07
State: Original
Status: In Progress
Timeline: Immediate and ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Director of Information Services Director of Performance Management/Instructional Technology Director of Staff Development Designated administrators
Evidence: Staff development evaluation and number of attendees
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP05, EP09, TL07
Goal 4: The district will establish the human and technical infrastructure to encourage communication and to improve access to data and educational resources.
Objective 4.1: The district will secure adequate funding for maintaining state-of-the-art technology resources for all BISD facilities.
Budget for this objective: $2,672,381.00
LRPT Category: Infrastructure for Technology
E-Rate Correlates: ER01
NCLB Correlates: 05 06 08 12
Objective 4.1: The district will secure adequate funding for maintaining state-of-the-art technology resources for all BISD facilities.
Budget for this objective: $2,672,381.00
LRPT Category: Infrastructure for Technology
E-Rate Correlates: ER01
NCLB Correlates: 05 06 08 12
Strategy 4.1.4: The district will have each campus allocate a percent of their local budget to technology needs, including professional development.
State: Original
Status: Completed
Timeline: Ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Superintendent Board of Trustees Director of Information Services Director of Performance Management/Instructional Technology Principals
Evidence: Campus plans Campus budgets 10% of campus budget committed to technology
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP01, I01, I04, I06, I07
State: Original
Status: Completed
Timeline: Ongoing
Person(s) Responsible: Superintendent Board of Trustees Director of Information Services Director of Performance Management/Instructional Technology Principals
Evidence: Campus plans Campus budgets 10% of campus budget committed to technology
Comments:
LRPT Correlates: EP01, I01, I04, I06, I07
(BISD Technology Plan, 2012)
(E-rate, 2012)
References:
BEAUMONT ISD Technology Plan for E-Rate Year 13. (2010-2013). Beaumont Independent School District, Beaumont, Texas.
E-rate. (2012). E-rate Information. Retrieved on February 27, 2012 from http://www.mecnet.net/erate.cfm.
Long-Range Plan for Technology, 2006-2020 http://www.tea.state.tx.us/WorkArea/linkit.aspx?LinkIdentifier=id&ItemID=2147494561&libID=2147494558.
No Child Left Behind policy. (2012). Retrieved on February 27, 2012 from http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/states/index.html.
I noticed you made a comment about even though the school has a technology plan, most of them are not implemented. I have the same issue in my school. I noticed in my plan, there is a evaluation that teachers are to be evaluated by and I have never seen this evaluations or what we would be evaluated by. This is an area I would like to help change in the district.
ReplyDeleteRoyer says there are different reason why the technology plans do not get implemented by leaders of the school or the teachers.
Royer states:
While many teachers still feel uncomfortable using technology in their teaching practice, it is also likely that teachers feel new technologies are unproven in the classroom
Should there be more evidence of the effectiveness of using technology in the classroom?
Royer, R. (2002). Supporting technology integration through action research. The Clearing House , 75(5), 233-237.
I am not sure more evidence would be as effective as more support - year round. We aren't evaluated really about our technology use either. I have been thinking about this since this class started - I really feel like we as educators need some type of follow-up and evaluation or assessment. In our district it seems as if the new technology is just "dumped" at our feet and you either figure it out and use it or it collects dust. Timing is an issue as well. It is difficult to find the time to plan out lessons involving technology and that cover the TEKS of the subject you are teaching as well. It would be great to have someone on campus to assist in that area. That way you could concentrate on your subject matter and know that someone is going to help you with the tech part.
DeleteJoy,
ReplyDelete"TECHNOLOGY WILL BE fully integrated into the curricula and instruction of the schools by December 31, 2006."
--Title II, Part D, Enhancing Education Through Technology, No Child Left Behind Act of 20
In order to comply with the EETT mandate cited above, schools must ensure that their teachers know how to integrate technology through curriculum and instruction, which first requires teachers to be proficient in the technology themselves. South Carolina created a powerful tool to help teachers acquire the necessary knowledge, skill, and attitude, and to understand what it takes to fully integrate technology. “The answer to the state's search for a valid, verifiable measure of teacher technology competency came in the form of a performance-based ePortfolio system developed by eSchoolware (www.eschoolware.com). eSchoolware™ is a leading provider of online technology tools for the K12 Education marketplace”(Bergman, 2006). The company’s suite of solutions includes a Proficiency Manager™ - incorporating standards-based assessments and creating individualized development plans for each user, an eLearning Manager™ - to allow for online course registration by teachers and students, an ePortfolio Platform™ - to capture documents and visual media demonstrating acquired skills and can be used to build individual graduation plans, and an eReporting System™ - to aggregate, analyze and present data (performance-based assessments, demographic, standardized test scores and other information) with easy to use report writing features” (Products and Services, 2012). This sounds like an awesome opportunity depending on the expense. I am in the process of researching it more. The overall concept is so needed in our education system. I will update as I find out more information. What is your take on mandating a program like this for educators? Do you feel like educators at Beaumont ISD would welcome this opportunity? ~Carol
References
Mainwaring, T., & Bergman, D. (2006). Tech-Savvy Teachers: South Carolina's Innovative ePortfolio System Is Helping Educators Get Up to Speed on Technology and Become More Comfortable Integrating New Tools into Their Classrooms. T H E Journal (Technological Horizons In Education), 33(12), 37+. Retrieved February 28, 2012, from Questia database: http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5016129867
Products and Services. (2012, February 27). Retrieved from FedVendor: http://www.fedvendor.com/contractor/USR20060519072048538/profile.htm
Carol, this sounds so interesting! I will definitely join you on the research of this service. We have some software packages that do some of the things you listed. We are using eduphoria this year to analyze testing data on every test we administer. It is also used for PDAS documents. Some teachers take to it readily and some seem to fight it tooth-and-nail. I think that will always be the case. We also have other software that allows us to register for our professional development provided by the district online, and another that allows students and parents to access grades as we enter them into the gradebook. I like the sound of everything in one package. Thanks for the information and I look forward to hearing more!!
DeleteJoy, excellent details of required standards and proposed objectives! Way to go!!!
ReplyDeleteThank you Dr. Shannon. Our technology plan for our district is well written, unfortunately I am not sure it is "well-followed".
Delete"The parts of the plan that I see my own school and district falling short in are: 1) All educators develop new learning environments that utilize technology as a flexible tool where learning is collaborative, interactive and customized;"
ReplyDeleteYour quote here could not be more corrrect for many schools. How I see it however, is that many teachers had the technology TEKS and standards thrown at them and have been given little or not support about how to implement them in their lessons. We have teachers who are experts at language arts, social studies, science, and math, with training and love for the subject, yet they were just informed suddenly that they must also become teachers of technology - a subject in which many are not experts and do not have a passion. I think we are approaching technology integration all wrong - we have to start by reaching the teachers. Teachers use in the classroom what they do themselves. Want teachers to communicate through websites? Help them build and maintain one. Want teachers to integrate cell phone use in research projects? Show them how to do this on their own devices. But don't just show in two hours and then yell "GO!" Integrate, remind, reinforce, and double-check. Teachers are learners too. Shouldn't we treat the learning of our teachers the same as the learning of our students?
Casey, I could not agree with you more! That is a problem our district definitely has. We have ONE day built into our school year for technology training...ONE day. There is no follow-up, no evaluations, no accountability..nothing. So basically it's just as you stated...."show in two hours and then yell GO". We are indeed still learners and we need all the elements of a lesson plan....just as we make sure to include them in our own classrooms. I am very interested in researching and developing some type of follow-up and continuous support and training for teachers throughout the year.
DeleteJoy
ReplyDeleteI am on the Technology Professional Development committee for our district and we are currently trying to write a plan. The major concern we are dealing with is time. We are considering giving our teachers options for in-service at the beginning of the school year. Instead of doing the same boring training we are looking into finding staff members who are highly qualified in areas to have mini workshops (make and take) to give the teachers more hands on practice with the technology device or instruction they need more assistance with. This will help cut down on cost and make our teachers feel more comfortable working with co-workers verses strangers.
Educational leaders and teacher cadres facilitate and support my use of technologies to enhance instructional methods that develop higher-level thinking, decision-making,and problem-solving skills (Star Chart, 2012)
Star Chart. (2012). Retrieved February 12, 2012, from www.starchart.epsilen.com
All of our technology inservices are conducted "in-house". Our teachers and supervisors provide the training. It does make it convenient to communicate after the training if one still has questions. And our district does exactly what you are talking about...several different sessions are offered and at different levels....you as an educator decide where you "fit" and what exactly you need more training in.
Delete